Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2019 DAILYLAW 4137 (PNJ)

SHRAVAN SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CWP/30912/2019 · 2026-07-23

Sudeepti Sharma

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-30912-2019 (O&M) -1- 227 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-30912-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.07.2026 Shravan Singh ......Petitioner Vs. Union of India and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Ghulam Nabi Malik, Advocate, for Mr. Rohit Ahuja, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Karan Kumar Jund, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondent No.1-UOI. Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing/setting aside the order dated 27.02.2019 (Annexure P-2) passed by the respondents vide which services of the petitioner have been terminated. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents contends that in view of the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in RA-LP-4-2024 IN/AND LPA-1476-2023 titled ‘Reena Panta Vs. Union of India and others’ on 26.08.2025, the present writ petition against the Society is not maintainable. VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.07.24 19:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-30912-2019 (O&M) -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to rebut the same. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Liberty is, however, granted to the petitioner to avail any other remedy as is available to him in accordance with law. 5. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 23.07.2026 Virender Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.07.24 19:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document