212 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-2447-2019 Date of decision: 09.12.2025 Sandeep Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Dhanda, Advocate for the respondents. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned letter dated 04.01.2016 (Annexure P-1) issued by the office of respondent No.1. 2. Despite the case having been called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that neither the petitioner nor his counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition. 3. Under these circumstances, having left with no other option, the present petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution accordingly. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 09.12.2025 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No NEHA 2025.12.09 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document