CWP-21434-202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 133 MAYA RAM STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. Rahul Singla for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, for respondents no.2 to 8 TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has mandamus directing the respondents to on account of respondents’ negligence on 19.05.2019 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that representations respectively, in that regard action has been taken so far. respondent no. period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Bhupender Singh, respondents no.2 to 8 decided by respondent 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: MAYA RAM Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Rahul Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advocate for respondents no.2 to 8. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia directing the respondents to pay compensation along wi on account of death of petitioner’s son due to respondents’ negligence on 19.05.2019. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that s, dated 10.07.2019 and 17.07.2025 in that regard are already pending before the respondents, but no action has been taken so far. At this stage, no.6 is directed to decide the said Notice of motion. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advocate no.2 to 8 and submits that the pending respondent no.6 - Sub Divisional Officer, Operation Sub Division IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21434-2026 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA inter alia, seeking a writ of pay compensation along with interest due to electrocution caused by the Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s 10.07.2019 and 17.07.2025, Annexures P-4 and P-5, already pending before the respondents, but no At this stage, he will be satisfied in case said representations in a specified Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the pending representations will be Sub Divisional Officer, Operation Sub Division, seeking a writ of th interest caused by the s 5, already pending before the respondents, but no will be satisfied in case in a specified accepts notice on behalf of will be , AMAN DUA 2026.07.21 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-21434-202 by passing a speaking Policy dated 08.07.2019 the amount of compensation four weeks thereafter 5. In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not passed and the benefits found admissible are not released within the stipulated periods, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. 16.07.2026 Ad 2026 -2- by passing a speaking/reasoned order in accordance with law Policy dated 08.07.2019, Annexure P-6, within the amount of compensation, if found admissible four weeks thereafter. In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed and the benefits found admissible are not released within the stipulated periods, the officer concerned shall pay 50,000 to the petitioner. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable order in accordance with law in terms of the within a period of three months and found admissible, will also be released within In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. In case the order is not passed and the benefits found admissible are not released within the stipulated periods, the officer concerned shall pay (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No terms of the and within er In case the order is not passed and the benefits found admissible are not released within the stipulated periods, the officer concerned shall pay ) AMAN DUA 2026.07.21 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document