Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010948032018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT NO: 69/2019 Between:
1. SHAIK FATHIMA, W/O LATE JILANI BASHA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, MUSLIM HOUSE WIFE, R/O OPP . TALUK OFFICE, PODILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
2. SHAIK RAHIMAN,, S/O LATE JILANI BASHA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, MUSLIM, TRADER, R/O OPP. OFFICE, PODILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
3. SHAIK NAYAB RASOOL,, S/O LATE JILANI BASHA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, MUSLIM, TRADER, R/O OPP . TALUK OFFICE, PODILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT(S) AND
1. VELISETTY VENKATESWARLU, S/O NARASAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, TRADER, R/O PODILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
2. SHAIK MOHAMMAD DIED, PRAKASAM
3. ALAGANI VENKATA SUBBA RAO, S/O CHINNA NARASIMHAM, HINDU, AGED ABOUT YEARS, TRADER, R/O PODILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
4. SHAIK MASTANBEE, W/O LATE MOHAMMAD KHASIRN, MUSLIM, AGED 56 YEARS, HOUSE WIRK- VISWANDHAPURAM MASJID, PODILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
5. SHAIK BIKARI RAHAMATH BASHA, S/O LATE MOHAMMAD KHASIM,
2
MUSLIM, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O VISWANADHAPURAM, NEAR MASJID, PODILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
6. SHAIK MASTAN SHARIF, S/O MOHAMMAD KHASIM, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O VISWANADHAPURAM, NEAR MASJID, PODILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
7. SHAIK MOHAMMAD KHASIM BASHA, S/O LATE MOHAMMAD KHASIM, MUSLIM, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O VISWANADHAPURAM, PODILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
8. SHAIK SHAMMI, D/O MOHAMMAD KHASIM, MUSLIM, AGED 34 YEARS, RIO VISAWANADHAPURAM, NEAR MASJID, PODILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. L J VEERA REDDY The Court made the following:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT No.69 of 2019
JUDGMENT:
Learned counsel for the appellants filed a letter dated 02.04.2026, stating that the matter is settled out of the Court and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal. The letter is taken on file.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________
JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS
Date: 06.04.2026 KNN
4
21 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS
APPEAL SUIT No.69 of 2019
(Dismissed as withdrawn)
Date: 06.04.2026
KNN