IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 210 JYOTI STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. contend that allocation of the departments has been done as per the merit alphabetically, a criteria which has been adopted vide resolution dated 20.08.2019, which has not instant petition of the instant petition directed to be decided in a time bound manner. 2. 3. representation within a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously 15.07.2026 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of decision Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. H.S.Kasan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Paramjit Singh, Advocate for Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate, for respondent No.3-HSAMB. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel refers to the written statement to contend that allocation of the departments has been done as per the merit alphabetically, a criteria which has been adopted vide resolution dated 20.08.2019, which has not been challenged by the peti instant petition, in view of which his learned counsel of the instant petition with liberty to file a directed to be decided in a time bound manner. Learned State counsel has no objec Dismissed as withdrawn. In case representation within a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-151-2020 (O & M) Date of decision: 15.07.2026 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Haryana. Mr. Paramjit Singh, Advocate for Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate, for Learned State counsel refers to the written statement to contend that allocation of the departments has been done as per the merit alphabetically, a criteria which has been adopted vide resolution dated challenged by the petitioner even in the , in view of which his learned counsel prays for withdrawal with liberty to file a representation which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner. Learned State counsel has no objection to the aforesaid. Dismissed as withdrawn. In case, the petitioner submits the representation within a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be considered (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.07.15 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.