APHC010110082019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 265/2019 Between: 1. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REP BY ITS MANAGER, VIJAYAWADA ...APPELLANT AND 1. G RAMBABU, BALARAMUNIPET, MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DIST 2. OLETI VENKATA REDDY, R/O. POTHIREDDYPALEM VILALGE, GOKAVARAM PANCHAYAT, BANDAR MANDAL ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Courtaggrieved by the order pass in MVOp. 218/2014 on the file of the court of motor accidents claims tribunal Machilipatnam IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to condone the delay of 91 days in filing the MACMA against the judgment and 2 award in MVOP. 218 of 2014 on the file of the court of the Motor accidents claim Tribunal, Machilipatnam dated 31.08.2018 IA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant stay of operation the decree and judgment in MVOp. 218/2014 on the file of the court of motor accidents claims tribunal machilipatnam dated 31-08-2018 IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the petitioners to come on record as respondents 3 to 5 in the above appeal MACMA No. 265/2019 as they are the Legal heirs of the deceased 1st respondent i.e., Gollapudi Rambabu who died on 28-04-2021 in the interest of Justice and to pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. NARESH BYRAPANENI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 The Court made the following judgment: When the matter was listed on 25.01.2026 and 16.02.2026, there was no representation for the appellant. Today also there is no representation for the appellant. It shows that the appellant is not inclined to prosecute the present appeal. 2. In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR Dt.16.04.2026 DSB 4 45 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR MACMA No.265 of 2019 Date 16.04.2026 U DSB