Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2019 DAILYLAW 4009 (PNJ)

VIJAY KUMAR v. HARYANA TOURISM CORPORATION LTD

CWP/2790/2019 · 2026-07-13

Aman Chaudhary

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 217 CWP-2790-2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.07.2026 VIJAY KUMAR ... Petitioner Versus HARYANA TOURISM CORPORATION LTD ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate and Mr. Chetan Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate and Ms. Anshu Gupta, Advocate for the respondent. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for counting his past service despite the fact that he was appointed afresh with regard to which he will submit a representation by relying upon the Rules basis whereon the claim is being made, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner. 2. Disposed of. 3. However, in case, the petitioner submits a representation within a period of 4 weeks, the same be decided by the respondents expeditiously, in accordance with law, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to the interest of the petitioner, the same shall contain reasons and he shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 13.07.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.07.13 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document