KULDEEP SINGH v. HARYANA SHAHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND ANR
CWP/3364/2019 · 2026-07-09
Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 4002 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 4002 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
211 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-3364-2019 Date of decision: 09.07.2026
KULDEEP SINGH ...PETITIONER
V/S
HARYANA SHAHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND ANOTHER
...RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
Present: Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate for the respondents. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1.
Present civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India for quashing of the impugned order dated 26.09.2018 (Annexure P-12), whereby the respondents had finally rejected the request of the petitioner to reverse the original plot number 3185, Sector-57, Gurugram, District Gurugram, to him, which was earlier allotted to the petitioner after completing all the formalities and which was cancelled by the respondents in the year 2012 without his consent.
2.
Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner and filed his vakalatnama after obtaining ‘no objection’ from the previous counsel, which is taken on record. He seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
3.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE
(SUBHAS MEHLA) July 09, 2026
JUDGE Manisha
(i) Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/No
(ii) Whether reportable
Yes/No
MANISHA 2026.07.13 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document