IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 238 CWP-16021-2019 Date of decision : 02.07.2026 Jagwinder Singh ...... Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. C.S. Jattana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. G.S. Sidhu, Advocate for respondent No.6. Mr. H.S. Rakhra, Advocate for respondent No.7. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Mr. Rakhra has produced document to show that the petitioner has obtained PR in Ontario State, Canada and thus the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the said fact. 3. Consequently, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. In case, the information supplied by Mr. Rakhra is found to be incorrect, counsel for the petitioner is granted liberty to move an appropriate application seeking revival of the writ petition. 4. Ordered accordingly. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 02.07.2026 Dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No DINESH KUMAR 2026.07.07 18:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document