Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3961 (PNJ)

SUSHMA RANI v. RISHI PAL KATARIA AND OTHERS

RFA/4384/2019 · 2026-07-06

Jagmohan Bansal

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

223 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** RFA-4384-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.07.2026 Sushma Rani ...Appellant Versus Rishi Pal Kataria and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Ashok Tyagi, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. A.P. Setia, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Abhinav Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Abhinash Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 submit that they have no objection if compensation is released to the appellant. 2. In the wake of statement of learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2, the appeal deserves to be allowed and accordingly allowed. 3. The appellant is at liberty to move an appropriate application seeking release of compensation before Executing Court. If such an application is filed, the Executing Court would adjudicate expeditiously. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 06.07.2026 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.07.06 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document