SAGAR DEVI AND OTHERS v. MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY AND OTHERS
CWP/22947/2019 · 2026-07-02
Harpreet Singh Brar
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3957 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3957 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CWP-22947-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
216
CWP-22947-2019 Date of Decision: 02.07.2026
Sagar Devi and others
.....Petitioners VERSUS Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Present : None for the petitioners.
Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate for Mr. A.S. Virk, Advocate for the respondents-University.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral)
1.
The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer for issuance of an appropriate writ or
order directing the respondents to allow ante-dated regularization to the petitioners w.e.f. 17.10.2002 in view of regularization policy (Annexure P-4). Further directing the respondents to allow to opt old pension scheme to petitioners along with consequential benefits by giving them opportunity to opt for old pension scheme. Further directing the respondents to fix the pay of petitioners in regular pay scales w.e.f. 17.10.2002 by allowing them ante dated regularization from 17.10.2002. Further directing the respondents not to discriminate the petitioners in the matter of pension under old pension scheme PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.07.03 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 CWP-22947-2019
as they employees of respondent-University prior to 01.01.2006. In alternate, respondent-University may be directed the petitioners, employees of University appointed prior to 01.01.2006 as they were appointed during 1989-1991 against sanctioned posts of Part Time Sweepers against the sanctioned posts of Part Time Sweepers and remained continue till their services were regularized in the year 2006.
2.
Today, the present case was called twice, but none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stands
disposed of.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE
02.07.2026
Puneet Chawla
Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No
Whether Reportable. :
Yes/No PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.07.03 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document