IN TH 109 Gram Pan Suraj Bha CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU defendant/a passed by plaintiff/res appeal pert been issued instance o 02.05.2019 due to non 15.10.2024 appellant h RSA-6336-2017 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.63 Date of decision :-19.03.202 Panchayat Village Dariyapur thro Versus j Bhan (deceased) through his LRs AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Divyansh Shukla, Advoca Mr. R.K.Chandharu, Advocate for the appellants. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present second appeal h dant/appellant against the concurren ed by the learned Courts below, whe tiff/respondent for permanent injunctio A perusal of the order-shee al pertains to the year 2017 and even issued till date. The matter has been nce of learned counsel for the 5.2019, 02.11.2023, 29.02.2024, 10.07 to non-representation on behalf of th 0.2024 and 18.03.2025. Vide order dated 02.11.2023 llant had sought time to file vakalatna 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH No.6336 of 2017 (O & M) .2026 r through its Sarpanch …..Appellant LRs …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA dvocate for vocate peal has been preferred by the ncurrent judgments and decrees , whereby the suit filed by the junction has been decreed. sheet reveals that the present d even notice of motion has not been repeatedly adjourned at the the appellant on 26.09.2018, , 10.07.2024 and 26.08.2025, and of the appellant on 12.02.2019, 1.2023, learned counsel for the alatnama; however, the same has VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.20 16.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document not been fi earnest eff not come fo has exhibit the present granting re conduct of in pursuing alternative of. March 19 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA-6336-2017 (O & M) een filed till date. Today, learned co est efforts, including written commun ome forward to pursue the matter. The aforesaid facts clearly dem xhibited a wholly casual and neglige resent appeal. Considerable judicial t ting repeated opportunities in the inter uct of the appellant reflects a lack of rsuing the lis. In such circumstances, this native but to dismiss the present appea Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any 9, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 ned counsel submits that despite mmunications, the appellant has rly demonstrate that the appellant egligent approach in prosecuting icial time has been consumed in e interest of justice; however, the ck of bona fides and seriousness , this Court is left with no appeal for want of prosecution. if any, shall also stand disposed ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.20 16.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document