CMP No. 16465 of 2019 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN CMP No. 16465 of 2019 in SA Sr.No.59582 of 2018 1. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Operation And Maintenance, Chennai. 2. The Superintending Engineer, Tneb, Operation And Maintenance, Trichy. 3. The Executive Engineer, Tneb, Operation And Maintenance, Ariyalur, Ariyalur District. 4. The Assistant Executive Engineer, TNEB, Sendurasi Yoen, Sendurai Taluk. 5. The Assistant Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, R.S.Mthur Village, Sendurai Taluk, Ariyalur District. ..Petitioners(s) Vs 1. Nirmala 2. Minor Vimalraj Represented By Next Friend Mother Nirmala, 3. Manickam 4. Ganaesan ..Respondent(s) Prayer in C.M.P.No.16465 of 2019: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, To condone the delay of 1838 days in filing the second appeal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 16465 of 2019 __________ Page2 of 4 Prayer in S.A.SR.No.59582 of 2018: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 29.10.2012 made in A.S.No.7 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Court, Ariyalur and partly allowed the judgment and decree dated 17.03.2010 made in O.S.No.88 of 2006 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Ariyalur. For Petitioners(s): Ms. Hemalatha Kajapathy For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran for R1 to R3 ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing, this Court did not find any “sufficient cause” to condone the delay. Hence, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and also made an endorsement to that effect. For the reasons stated as well as recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the Second Appeal in S.A.SR.No.59582 of 2018 is hereby rejected at the SR stage itself. 2. As the condone delay petition is rejected, the petitioners/appellants shall be entitled to half of the Court fees in terms of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955. 13-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No VKR https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 16465 of 2019 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1.The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ariyalur. 2.The Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 16465 of 2019 __________ Page4 of 4 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. VKR CMP No. 16465 of 2019 in SA Sr.No.59582 of 2018 13-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis