SHRI DATTATRAY SANSTHAN SHIKHAR THR. ITS SECRETARY AND NAIB TAHSILDAR, MAHUR, NANDED v. VIKAS VASANTRAO KSHIRSAGAR AND OTHERS
CRA/48/2019 · 2026-09-09
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3777 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3777 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
931.cra.48.19 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Revision Application [CRA] No.48 of 2019 Shri Dattatray Sansthan Shikhar vs. Vikas Vasantrao Kshirsagar and others =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. A.S. Dhore, Advocate for the Applicant. CORAM : Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J. DATE : 9 th SEPTEMBER, 2
026.
The learned Counsel appearing for the applicant makes a statement that he has already filed pursis Stamp No.2/2026, stating therein that despite service of notice, he has not received instructions. So also, by the said notice, he informed the applicant about his intention to withdraw his Vakalatnama.
02. The said notice was sent by Speed Post. As per the postal tracking report, the applicant was served with the notice on 06/07/2026. Despite service, the applicant remains absent. Therefore, it shows that the applicant is having no interest in prosecuting the appeal.
03. Hence, it is dismissed for want of prosecution, with no order as to costs.
JUDGE *sandesh 2026:BHC-NAG:12129 Signed by: Mr. Sandesh Waghmare Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 12/09/2026 16:21:06