Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3773 (PNJ)

NIRMAL SINGH AND ORS v. M/S SIDHU SANDHU TRADERS

RSA/3416/2019 · 2026-03-11

Nidhi Gupta

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 253 Nirmal Sin M/s Sidhu CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU against the the suit file Rs.7,69,658 amount pa interest @ alongwith f submits th amicably s said settlem withdraw th RSA-3416-2019 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal Date of decision :-11.03 al Singh and others Versus Sidhu-Sandhu Traders AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Gaurav Kalsi, Advocate fo Mr. H.S. Batth, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Saini, Adv HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The defendants have filed t st the concurrent findings of the lear uit filed by the respondent/plaintiff f ,69,658/- i.e. Rs.6,36,081/- as balance nt paid by the plaintiff to the defen est @12% per annum w.e.f. May with future interest, has been decreed At the very outset, learned its that the dispute between the ably settled before the learned Lok A settlement, it is prayed that the appe draw the present second appeal. 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH ppeal No.3416 of 2019 (O & M) .03.2026 …..Appellants …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA cate for i, Advocate for the respondent. filed the present second appeal e learned Courts below whereby ntiff for a decree of recovery of alance advance money/principal defendants and Rs.1,33,577/- as May 2011 upto January 2013 ecreed by both the Courts below. rned counsel for the appellants the parties has already been Lok Adalat. On the basis of the appellants may be permitted to VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.13 17.31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document also admits parties bef objection in second app parties and before the as withdraw by the term them befor of. March 11 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA-3416-2019 (O & M) Learned counsel appearing on admits the factum of settlement having es before the learned Lok Adalat an ction in case the appellants are permitt nd appeal. Heard. In view of the statement made es and keeping in view the settlemen re the learned Lok Adalat, the present ithdrawn. Needless to observe that the he terms and conditions of the settle before the learned Lok Adalat. Pending application(s), if any 1, 2026 speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 ring on behalf of the respondent having been effected between the alat and submits that he has no ermitted to withdraw the present t made by learned counsel for the tlement arrived at between them resent second appeal is dismissed t the parties shall remain bound settlement so effected between if any, shall also stand disposed ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.13 17.31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document