Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3766 (MAD)

SULTHANIA SUNNATH JAMATH MASJID v. A.S.ISMAIL

AS/88/2019 · 2026-06-25

R Kalaimathi

Transfer Petitionbody2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AS No. 88 of 2019 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI AS No. 88 of 2019 1. Sulthania Sunnath Jamath Masjid Rep By Its Mutawalli A.J.Ziaudeen, D.No.4 Old Pallivasal Street, Anaimalai, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore 642 104 2. A.J.Ziaudeen S/o Abdul Jamel Ravuthor D.No.39 Mariamman Coil Street, Anaimalai, Pollachi Tk, Coimbatore 642 104 ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. A.S.Ismail S/O LATE SYED MOHAMMED, D.NO.8 MARIAMMAL KOVIL STREET, RICE GODWON, ANAIMALAI. Appeal is dismissed against R1, vide court order dated 03.02.2026 in AS.No.88/2019 (ADMCJ) 2. A.S.Sirajudeen S/o Late Syed Mogammed, D.No.29 Old Pallivasal Street, Anaimalai 3. A.S.Kaleel S/o Late Syed Mohammed D.No.8 Mariammalkovil St, Roce Godwon, Anaimalai. 4. A.S.Jafar Ali S/o Late Syed Mohammed, D.No.8 Mariammalkovil St, Roce Godwon, Anaimalai. 5. A.I.Syed Mohammed S/o Late Syed Mohammed, D.No.8 Mariammalkovil St, Roce Godwon, Anaimalai. ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 88 of 2019 __________ Page2 of 4 Prayer: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure r/w order 41 Rule 1 of C.P.C to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 18-01-2018 passed in O.S.No.628 of 2006 on the file of Court of Principal Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore. For Appellant(s): No Appearance For Respondent 2 to 5: Mr.T.M.Hariharan JUDGMENT When the matter came up for hearing on 23.06.2026, the learned counsel for the appellants reported no instructions for the appellants. Necessary endorsement has been made in the Memorandum of Appeal by the learned counsel and Registry was directed to delete the name of the counsel for the appellants and print the name of the appellants in the cause list. 2. None appeared for the appellants today. The respondents 2-5 are represented through their counsel. Hence, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. 25-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No smn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 88 of 2019 __________ Page3 of 4 To. The Principal Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS No. 88 of 2019 __________ Page4 of 4 R.KALAIMATHI, J. SMN AS No. 88 of 2019 25-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis