VITTHAL RAMRAO VEER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
CA/72/2019 · 2026-09-04
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3747 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3747 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 923-ca-73-2019+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 73 OF 2019 IN FAST/10937/2018 Kalyan Bhaurao Mule VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ... Mr. V. D. Gunale, Advocate for Applicants Mr. K. B. Jadhavar, AGP for Respondent-State Mr. R. S. Sarvadnya, Sr. Panel Counsel for Respondent no.2/Union of India ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 74 OF 2019 IN FAST/11133/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 71 OF 2019 IN FAST/11131/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2019 IN FAST/11128/2018 …..
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 04TH SEPTEMBER, 2026 P.C. :- CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 73 OF 2019 IN FAST/10937/2018 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 74 OF 2019 IN FAST/11133/2018 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 71 OF 2019 IN FAST/11131/2018 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2019 IN FAST/11128/2018 . Feeling aggrieved by the deficit enhancement in compensation at the hands of learned 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur in following Land Acquisition References, the applicants-claimants have preferred the respective First Appeals for enhancement of compensation. 2026:BHC-AUG:41251
2 923-ca-73-2019+ Sr. No. Civil Application No. L.A.R. No.
Judgment date Delay 1 73/2019 77/2003 22.10.2012 1885 2 74/2019 84/2003 22.10.2012 1885 3 71/2019 81/2003 22.10.2012 1885 4 72/2019 87/2003 22.10.2012 1885
2. There is delay of 1885 days caused in filing the respective First Appeals and hence the applications are filed by the applicants-claimants.
3. Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent number 1 and Mr. R. S. Sarvadnya, learned senior panel counsel, waives service of notice for respondent number 2.
4. The reasons for condonation of delay are stated in the respective applications. It is stated that the entire source of livelihood of the appliants-claimants is taken away under the compulsory land acquisition. Due to financial crisis and for want of legal knowledge, the applicants could not approach learned Advocate for further proceedings.
5. It is submitted that enhancement in the compensation is a statutory right of a party and must not be defeated on the technical grounds of litigation.
3 923-ca-73-2019+
6. Mr. V. D. Gunale, learned Advocate for the applicants- claimants also submits that applicants are ready to waive interest and shall not claim any benefit for the delayed period. Mr. Gunale in all fairness submits that the entire set of the Appeals and the Applications shall be served to the other side both in physical form as well as through online mode.
7. Learned AGP and learned Senior Panel counsel, request to pass appropriate order.
8. In view of the law laid down in the case of Suresh Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and ors., (Civil Appeal arising out of (C) No.670/2020) and connected matters decided on 23.04.2025, I deem it appropriate to allow the Civil Applications. Hence, the following order:
ORDER a. Civil Applications stand allowed. b. Delay caused in filing the respective First Appeals stands condoned. c. Applicants-claimants shall not be entitled for the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. c. Appeals be registered.
4 923-ca-73-2019+ FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.10937 OF 2018 FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.11133 OF 2018 FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.11131 OF 2018 FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.11128 OF 2018 . Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGP waives services of notice for respondent number 1. Mr. R. S. Sarvadnya, learned senior panel counsel waives service of notice for respondent number 2.
2. Call record and proceedings.
3. Stand over to 16.10.2026.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ) Rushikesh/2026