1 950-wp-4577-2019.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4577 OF 2019 Nilesh Kashinath Shinde And Others VERSUS Municipal Corporation Latur Through Its Commissioner ... Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Tukaram Maruti Venjane ... CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026 P.C.: 1. Learned advocate Mr. Suhas P. Urgunde has return the case papers to the petitioners for engaging another advocate. The name of learned advocate Mr. Suhas P. Urgunde also appears as advocate for the respondent/corporation. The appearance of learned advocate Mr. Suhas P. Urgunde is discharged for petitioners in view of appearance of Mr. Bedre as advocate for the petitioners and also for the respondent/corporation in view of appearance of Mr. Venjane as advocate for respondent/corporation. 2. Learned advocate Mr. V.S. Bedre has placed on record copy of communication dated 28.08.2026 issued to the petitioners along with photocopies of the postal receipts and sealed envelopes of the communication which shows that notice sent to petitioner no.1-Nilesh Shinde is returned with endorsement “Not known”. The notices sent to petitioner no.2-Sunita Valtate and Petitioner No.3-Shaikh Ateeq 2026:BHC-AUG:41463 2 950-wp-4577-2019.odt Farukhmiya are returned unserved with endorsement “Insufficient address”. 3. Mr. Tukaram Venjane, learned advocate for respondent/corporation makes a statement that the benefit of permanency in services is granted to the petitioners and as such, cause in the petition is rendered infructuous. 4. Accepting the statement, writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. [ROHIT W. JOSHI J.] Mujaheed//