(1) 922crirevn18.19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 922 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 18 OF 2019 Jagannath S/o. Mahadeo Pawar ….Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …..Respondent Mr. H. V. Tungar, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. N. R. Thorat, Advocate for the Respondent -wife Mr. C. V. Bhadane, APP for the respondents/State CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 04th SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Mr. Tungar, learned Advocate states that the informant is not party in this matter. Therefore, he seeks leave to add the informant-wife as Respondent. 2. Leave is granted. 3. Amendment be carried out forthwith. 4. The learned Advocate for the parties have tendered a copy of the compromise terms duly signed by them before this Court. As per the said compromise terms the informant has decided not to prosecute the Applicant and to withdraw the complaint. The parties have settled their dispute and arrived at settlement as follows: 1 of 3 2026:BHC-AUG:41369 (2) 922crirevn18.19 “The Applicant and the informant have decided to get divorce by filing mutual consent under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the learned Court at Beed. The informant has decided to accept the offer of Rs.7 lakhs towards full and final maintenance and alimony and out of that Rs.2 lakhs he has already transferred to her account No.43860100004413 maintained by her in the bank of Baroda on 03-09-2026 itself. The parties have also decided that the remaining amount of Rs.5 lakhs would be paid within period of twenty four months.” 5. Since the parties have compromised the dispute between themselves, the informant is having no objection to quash and set aside the order passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Beed in RCC No.137/2014 dated 31-03-2015 as well as the judgment and order dated 22-04-2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Beed in Appeal No. 57/2015. 6. In view of the aforesaid settlement, the instant Revision Application is allowed. 7. The judgment and order dated 18-12-2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Beed in Criminal Appeal No. 57/2015 thereby confirming the judgment and order dated 31-03-2015 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Beed in RCC No. 137/2014 is hereby quashed and set aside. The Applicant is 2 of 3 (3) 922crirevn18.19 acquitted in Crime No.15/2014 registered for the offence under Section 498-A of the IPC by Police Station, Pimpalner. 8. The copy of the compromise terms is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for the purpose of the identification. 9. However, it shall be open for the Respondent/Informant to approach this Court again if there is breach of compromise terms at the behest of Applicant herein. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ] VishalK/922crirevn18.19 3 of 3