Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3700 (PNJ)

DAVINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER v. UMAR BASHIR AND OHTERS

FAO/5927/2019 · 2026-02-10

Nidhi Gupta

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FAO-5927 IN THE HIG 237 Davinder Ka Umar Bashir CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. seek enhanc them vide i Accident Cl MACP- 240 Vehicles Ac 2. yet to be iss National Lok 3. the appellan informed ab appearance o 27-2019 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA FAO Date o der Kaur and another Versus Bashir and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of filing the present nhancement of compensation amoun vide impugned Award dated 25.03. ent Claims Tribunal, Jalandhar, in 240-2015 dated 03.11.2015 filed un les Act, 1988. The matter pertains to year 201 be issued. On 13.08.2022, when this al Lok Adalat, following order has bee “After negotiations, the m Accordingly, let the mat Court for taking appropriate ac Accordingly, as per office repo ppellant; and learned counsel for t ed about the date fixed through e-ma rance on behalf of the appellants. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-5927-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.02.2026 .… Appellants .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA sent appeal the appellant-claimants mount of ₹11,49,805/- awarded to 25.03.2019, by the learned Motor , in a claim petition bearing No. under Section 166 of the Motor ar 2019 and notice in main appeal is n this appeal was put up before the has been passed:- the matter could not be settled. matter be sent back to the High te action.” e report, notice has been issued to for the appellant has also been mail. However, none has put in ants to otor No. otor al is the gh d to t in RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.10 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-5927 4. have exhibit litigation. It Court has the interest o utterly casua nor their cou Thus, this Co non-prosecu 5. 6. 10.02.2026 rishu 27-2019 (O&M) -2- A bare reading of the above exhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very been expended in affording oppo terest of justice. On the other hand, th casual and careless approach. It is cl counsel are seriously interested in this Court is left with no other option e rosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable facts shows that the appellants tude in their pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the g opportunities to the appellants in and, the appellants have adopted an It is clear that neither the appellants sted in pursuing the present matter. ption except to dismiss the same for any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No s sent the in d an . for RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.10 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.