RAJWANT SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRA-AD/481/2019 · 2026-03-30
Anoop Chitkara, Sukhvinder Kaur
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3688 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3688 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
226
CRA-AD-481-2019
Date of Decision: 30.03.2026
Rajwant Singh and others
...Appellants Versus State of Punjab and Another
…Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR
Present: Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Amit Kumar Saini, Advocate for the appellants.
Ms. Pooja Nayar Sharma, DAG, Punjab.
**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
1. The present matter is an appeal challenging the order of acquittal dated 05.06.2018 passed by the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar, whereby the accused/respondent No.2 herein, namely, Sukhdev Singh was acquitted from the offence punishable under Section 307 of IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants pleads no instructions. It appears that the appellants/complainant(s)/victim(s) are not interested to pursue the present appeal.
3. Given above, the present Leave to Appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution with liberty to file a fresh one. It is clarified that that Registry of this Court shall not entertain any application for restoration of the present matter. However, time for which the present Leave to Appeal was pending before this Court shall not be counted for the purpose of limitation, as the limitation would start from tomorrow.
(ANOOP CHITKARA)
JUDGE
(SUKHVINDER KAUR)
JUDGE 30.03.2026 Anjal
Whether speaking/reasoned YES Whether reportable NO ANJAL GUPTA 2026.04.02 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document