IN TH 109 Sanjay Ku Municipal CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU against the below, whe the impug Commissio raise const been dismi inclined to judgments for the app RSA-3834-2019 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.38 Date of decision :-27.02.202 ay Kumar Versus icipal Committee, Taraori and anot AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Rajinder Goel, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.D. Bawa, Advocate with Mr. Rishabh Rana, Advocate a Mr. Samuel Gill, Advocate for HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present second appeal has st the concurrent judgments and dec w, whereby suit filed by the plaintiff/ap impugned order dated 29.3.2011 missioner, Karnal whereby the sanctio construction on the plot in question dismissed by both the Courts below. After arguing for some time, ned to interfere in the concurrent ments and decrees of the learned Cou he appellant prays that he may be p 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH No.3834 of 2019 (O & M) .2026 …..Appellant another …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ocate te with ocate and ate for respondent No.1-MC. eal has been filed by the plaintiff nd decrees of the learned Courts ntiff/appellant for declaration that .2011 passed by the Deputy sanction granted to the plaintiff to estion had been withdrawn, has low. time, when this Court was not rrent findings recorded in the d Courts below, learned counsel y be permitted to withdraw the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.27 19.06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document present app as per law. February Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA-3834-2019 (O & M) nt appeal with liberty to take recourse r law. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with Pending application(s), if any, uary 27, 2026 speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 course to the appropriate remedy with the liberty aforesaid. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.27 19.06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document