Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3670 (MAD)

K.MANOHARAN, v. THE COMMISSIONER,

WP(MD)/10583/2019 · 2026-03-04

M Jothiraman, N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.10583 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W.P(MD)No.10583 of 2019 and W.M.P(MD)No.8112 of 2019 K.Manoharan ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Commissioner, Tiruchirapalli City Municipal Corporation, Tiruchirapalli. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Ariyamangalam Zone, Ariyamangalam Zonal Office, Palakkarai, Tiruchirapalli. 3.The Member Secretary, Local Planning Authority, Tiruchirapalli City Municipal Corporation, Tiruchirapalli. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.10583 of 2019 4.P.Rajendran 5.S.Karthik 6.P.Venkatraman 7.P.Radhakrishnan 8.P.Sabarish ... Respondents (R – 8 is impleaded vide order dated 02.07.2025 in W.M.P(MD)No.10176 of 2019) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take action against the illegal and unauthorized construction of commercial complex by the respondents 4 to 7 in S.Nos.179/38 and 179/39 at Thanjai Main Road (North), Thiruveumbur, Tiruchirapalli District within the time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan (R1 & R2) : Mr.Kishore Ram (R3) for M/s.R.B.Law Associates : Mr.PT.S.Narendravasan (R4 to R7) : Mr.B.Anandhan (R8) 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.10583 of 2019 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to take action against the illegal and unauthorized construction of a commercial complex by the respondents 4 to 7 in S.Nos.179/38 and 179/39 at Thanjai Main Road (North), Thiruveumbur, Tiruchirapalli District. 2.It is the case of the petitioner that the respondents 4 to 7 have each obtained separate building plans for 2000 square feet. Taking advantage of the four plans, they have jointly put up a structure and constructed a commercial complex, which is in violation of the approved plans. Hence, the petitioner seeks action against the respondents 4 to 7. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 4 to 7 submitted that the respondents 4 to 7 had already submitted a revised plan in the year 2019 itself and that orders have been passed thereon. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.10583 of 2019 4.Considering the fact that the construction of the commercial complex is not in dispute, there shall be a direction to the authority concerned to conduct an enquiry in this regard and, if any violation is found, to take action in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to respondents 4 to 7. 5.With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [N.S.K.,J.] [M.J.R.,J.] 04.03.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes ps 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.10583 of 2019 To 1.The Commissioner, Tiruchirapalli City Municipal Corporation, Tiruchirapalli. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Ariyamangalam Zone, Ariyamangalam Zonal Office, Palakkarai, Tiruchirapalli. 3.The Member Secretary, Local Planning Authority, Tiruchirapalli City Municipal Corporation, Tiruchirapalli. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.10583 of 2019 N.SATHISH KUMAR , J. and M.JOTHIRAMAN , J. ps ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.10583 of 2019 DATED : 04.03.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis