227
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CM-7365-CI-2019 in/and RA-RF-97-2019 in RFA-3046-2005 Date of decision: 12.02.2026 Rajbala and others . . . . applicants/appellants Vs. State of Haryana and another . . . . Respondents **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA **** Present: - None for the review applicants/appellants. Mr.Gaurav Garg, AAG, Haryana. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) There is no representation on behalf of the review applicants- appellants. Same was the position on the previous date of hearing. Mr.Vikrant Hooda, Advocate, through whom, the application for review has been moved, has been duly intimated by the Registry, but still there is no response. 2. It appears that review applicants-appellants are no longer interested in pursuing the appeal and as such, the application for condonation of delay in filing the review application as well as the main appeal is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. (DEEPAK GUPTA) 12.02.2026 JUDGE 
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VIVEK PAHWA 2026.02.12 17:19 I agree to specified portions of this document Chandigarh