W.P.(MD) No.3133 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W.P.(MD) No.3133 of 2019 R.Muralimohan, S/o.Ramanathan, Karuppatti Muniyasamy Alayam Poosari, Alavaikaraivadi, Keelakkarai Post, Ramanathapuram Dist - 623 517. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 4.The Tahsildar, Keelakkarai, Ramanathapuram District. 5.T.K.Anwar Basha ... Respondents _____________ Page No. 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.3133 of 2019 [R5 is impleaded vide court order dated 25.06.2025 in W.M.P.(MD) No.3049 of 2019] Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.01.2019 and consequently direct the officials to take necessary action and to remove the encroachment made by the fifth respondent in Survey No.599/7 Arulmigu Sri Karuppatti Muniyasamy Temple, Keelakkarai, Ramanathapuram District. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Muthumani For R1 to R4 : Mr.D.Sasikumar Additional Government Pleader ****** O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by Hon'ble MR.N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.] The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 14.01.2019 and to take necessary action to remove the encroachment made by the fifth respondent in Survey No.599/7, Arulmigu Sri Karuppatti Muniyasamy Temple, Keelakkarai, Ramanathapuram District. _____________ Page No. 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.3133 of 2019 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the fifth respondent has encroached upon the temple's property by putting up a structure. 3. The status report filed by the fourth respondent clearly indicates that in fact, the temple is situated in patta land. Since the subject land is patta land and there is no encroachment as alleged by the petitioner and as the temple is situated in the disputed patta land, no orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. [N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.] 02.03.2026 JEN Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order Copy To: 1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Ramanathapuram District. _____________ Page No. 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.3133 of 2019 2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 4.The Tahsildar, Keelakkarai, Ramanathapuram District. _____________ Page No. 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.3133 of 2019 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J. AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J. JEN W.P.(MD) No.3133 of 2019 02.03.2026 _____________ Page No. 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis