SUMITRA v. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND OTHERS
CWP/37591/2019 · 2026-05-05
Jagmohan Bansal
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3629 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3629 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
**** 220
CWP-37591-2019 Date of Decision: 05.05.2026
SUMITRA
...Petitioner Vs.
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND OTHERS
…Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Kuldeep Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms. Jyotsna, Advocate for
Mr. Ashish Yadav, Advocate for respondents
*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 27.10.2017 passed by Ld. Permanent Lok Adalat.
2.
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that present petition may be disposed of in terms of order dated 08.12.2025 passed by this Court in a bunch of petitions including CWP-20463-2016 titled as Raj Kapoor Vs. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam & Ors.
3.
Disposed of in terms of Raj Kapoor (supra).
4.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE May 05, 2026 Deepak DPA
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.05 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document