Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3628 (PNJ)

PANKAJ SINGH AND ANOTHER v. AMANDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS

CR/5753/2019 · 2026-04-20

Nidhi Gupta

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CR-5753-20 IN THE HI 222 Pankaj Singh Amandeep S CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. aside of im Additional D Order XXXI the learned been dismiss 2. 5, 7 to 9, 11 rendered inf titled as ‘Pa been dismiss Mukerian, vi and decree d 2019 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H CR-57 Date o j Singh and another Versus deep Singh and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None for the petitioners. Mr. GS Bedi, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 5, 7 to I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present revision petition h impugned order dated 22.08.20 onal District Judge, Hoshiarpur wh XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Sec arned trial Court vide order dated 31 ismissed by the learned Ist Appellate C At the very outset, learned cou o 9, 11 and 12 submits that the prese ed infructuous as, the main Civil S Pankaj Singh and others vs. Ama ismissed by the learned Additional C rian, vide judgment and decree dated 1 cree dated 19.11.2025 handed over in ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 5753-2019 Date of Decision: 20.04.2026 .… Petitioners .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA , 7 to 9, 11 and 12. ition has been filed seeking setting 2.08.2019 passed by the learned whereby the application under th Section 151 although allowed by ted 31.05.2019 (Annexure P-4) has ellate Court. ed counsel for respondents No. 2 to present revision petition has been ivil Suit bearing No. CS/1702019 Amandeep Singh and others’, has onal Civil Judge (Senior Division), ated 19.11.2025. Copy of judgment ver in Court is taken on record. tting rned nder by has 2 to een 019 has ion), ent RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.20 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CR-5753-20 3. i.e. 14.05.20 petitioner ha twice. 4. 5. the responde is disposed o 6. 20.04.2026 rishu 2019 -2- Perusal of order-sheets reveals t .05.2025, the petitioner had gone un ner has gone un-represented, despite Heard. In view of the afore-noted subm pondents No. 2 to 5, 7 to 9, 11 and 12 osed of as having been rendered infru Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable veals that on the last date of hearing un-represented. Even today, the espite the case having been called d submissions of learned counsel for and 12, the present revision petition d infructuous. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No ring , the lled l for ition RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.20 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.