PANKAJ SINGH AND ANOTHER v. AMANDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS
CR/5753/2019 · 2026-04-20
Nidhi Gupta
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3628 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3628 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CR-5753-20 IN THE HI
222
Pankaj Singh
Amandeep S
CORAM: H
Present: -
NIDHI GUP
1.
aside of im Additional D
Order XXXI the learned been dismiss
2.
5, 7 to 9, 11 rendered inf titled as ‘Pa been dismiss Mukerian, vi and decree d 2019
-1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H
CR-57 Date o
j Singh and another
Versus
deep Singh and others
M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH
None for the petitioners.
Mr. GS Bedi, Advocate
for respondents No. 2 to 5, 7 to
I GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
The present revision petition h impugned order dated 22.08.20 onal District Judge, Hoshiarpur wh XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Sec arned trial Court vide order dated 31 ismissed by the learned Ist Appellate C
At the very outset, learned cou o 9, 11 and 12 submits that the prese ed infructuous as, the main Civil S Pankaj Singh and others vs. Ama ismissed by the learned Additional C rian, vide judgment and decree dated 1 cree dated 19.11.2025 handed over in
ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 5753-2019 Date of Decision: 20.04.2026
.… Petitioners
.... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA , 7 to 9, 11 and 12. ition has been filed seeking setting 2.08.2019 passed by the learned whereby the application under th Section 151 although allowed by ted 31.05.2019 (Annexure P-4) has ellate Court. ed counsel for respondents No. 2 to present revision petition has been ivil Suit bearing No. CS/1702019 Amandeep Singh and others’, has onal Civil Judge (Senior Division), ated 19.11.2025. Copy of judgment ver in Court is taken on record.
tting rned nder by has 2 to een 019 has ion), ent RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.20 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
CR-5753-20
3.
i.e. 14.05.20 petitioner ha twice.
4.
5.
the responde is disposed o
6.
20.04.2026 rishu
2019
-2-
Perusal of order-sheets reveals t .05.2025, the petitioner had gone un ner has gone un-represented, despite
Heard.
In view of the afore-noted subm pondents No. 2 to 5, 7 to 9, 11 and 12 osed of as having been rendered infru
Pending application(s), if any, s 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
veals that on the last date of hearing un-represented. Even today, the espite the case having been called d submissions of learned counsel for and 12, the present revision petition d infructuous. any, shall also stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No
Yes/No ring , the lled l for ition RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.20 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.