204 CRM-A-2682-2019 RAHUL VS. RAVINDER @ RAVI AND ORS. Present: Mr. Randeep Singh, Advocate the applicant. None for the respondents. ***** CRM-A-2682-2019 None has appeared on behalf of the respondents. Counsel for the complainant submits that he has a very good case on merit and there is sufficient evidence on record which is sufficient for convic#on of respondents. There is no apprecia#on of evidence in judgment of acqui'al dated 03.12.2018. Leave to appeal granted. Registry to assign number to appeal. Main appeal Heard. Admi'ed. Registry to issue post admission no#ce to the respondents. The accused i.e. respondents to execute a bond for a'endance within two months, undertaking to appear in this Court, in case appeal is allowed. Given above, the accused-respondents shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. Ten Thousand only (INR 10,000/-), and furnish one surety for Rs. Ten thousand only (INR 10,000/-), to the sa#sfac#on of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Before accep#ng the sure#es, the concerned Court must sa#sfy that if the accused fails to appear in Court, then such surety is capable of producing them before the Court. The furnishing of the personal bonds shall be deemed acceptance of the all s#pula#ons, terms, and condi#ons of this bail order. Registry to communicate this order to the trial Court without any delay. In case of failure of respondents to furnish bond, the concerned Court shall proceed further in accordance with law. There would be no need for a cerfied copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the accused can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and aest it to be a true copy. In case the aesng officer wants to verify the authencity, such an officer can also verify its authencity and may download and use the downloaded copy for aesng bonds. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 09.04.2026 Jyo-II JYOTI 2026.04.10 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.