MANISHA GOKHALE SHAH v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
WP/3666/2019 · 2026-08-25
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3557 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3557 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
17-WP-3666-2019 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3666 OF 2019 Manisha Gokhale Shah ...Petitioner/s Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. ...Respondent/s ________________________________________________________________ Mr. Chandansingh Shekawat, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State. Mr. Sahil Kakad, Advocate for the Respondent (through VC). _________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 25th AUGUST, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for respondent.
2.
Learned counsel for respondent submits that the proceeding before the Trial Court is stayed by the learned Sessions Court and this Court.
3. The petitioner is seeking expeditious disposal of the pending proceeding.
4. As the proceeding before the Trial Court is stayed by the Sessions Court and this Court, the petitioner is at liberty to file fresh petition after the stay granted to the Trial Court proceeding is vacated.
5. The petition is accordingly disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2026.08.27 18:44:39 +0530