AMAR MARUTIRAO NAIKWADE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/1624/2019 · 2026-08-18
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3553 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3553 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1624.19WP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 925 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1624 OF 2019 AMAR MARUTIRAO NAIKWADE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.Sayyed Tauseef Yaseen APP for Respondent-State : Mr.N.B.Patil … CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 18.08.2026 P.C. : 1] Heard. The petition is filed for direction to the respondents-Police Officials to take action against the respondent nos.4 to 6 pursuant to the complaint dated
11.09.2019. However, the learned APP placed on record a communication dated 07.12.2019 mentioning that the complaint dated 11.09.2019 was enquired into and nothing was found about commission of cognizable offence by the respondent nos. 4 to 6. The said communication is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. 2026:BHC-AUG:37758-DB
1624.19WP 2 2] In view of the same, nothing survives in the present Writ Petition and the same stands disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC