Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3511 (MAD)

M.Thoppasamy Retired v. The Principal Secretary

WP/7059/2019 · 2026-04-10

T Vinod Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP Nos. 7059 & 7060 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WP Nos.7059 & 7060 of 2019 and WMP Nos.16960, 16965, 16967 & 16969 of 2020 M.Thoppasamy Retired (SS1 810/Vlr) Petitioner in WP No.7059 of 2019 D.Ganapathy, Retired (HC 3460/Vlr Petitioner in WP No.7060 of 2019 Vs 1. The Principal Secretary Home Department Govt. of Tamil nadu, Secretariat, Fort.St.George, Chennai-9. 2. The Director General of Police Dr. Radhakrishna Salai, Chennai-4. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Vellore District,Vellore- 9. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Ambur Sub- Division, Vellore District, Vellore. Respondents in both cases Common Prayer Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the record 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Nos. 7059 & 7060 of 2019 of H1(1) PR.60/12/U/R 3(b) and H1(1) PR.61/12/U/R 3(b) both dated 25.04.2013 issued by the 3rd Respondent and quash the same and directing the respondents to grant back wages of Increment from 25.04.2016 till date. In both cases For Petitioners : No Appearance For Respondents : Mrs.V.Yamunadevi, Special Government Pleader COMMON ORDER Despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners in both cases, when the matter was called in the forenoon session. Thus, the matter was passed over. Even when the matter was called again in the afternoon session, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 2. On perusal of the record shows that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on earlier dates of hearing i.e., on 09.01.2026 and 06.04.2026 and that this Court had directed the matter to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Thus, this Court is of the view that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the Writ Petitions and accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 10-04-2026 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Nos. 7059 & 7060 of 2019 vum Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Principal Secretary Home Department govt of Tamil nadu, Secretariat, Fort.St.George Chennai-9 2.Director General of Police Dr. Radhakrishna salai chennai-4 3.Superitendent of Police, Vellore District Vellore- 9 4.Deputy superintendent of police Ambur sub- Division, Vellore district, vellore 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Nos. 7059 & 7060 of 2019 T.VINOD KUMAR J. vum WP Nos.7059 & 7060 of 2019 and WMP Nos.16960, 16965, 16967 & 16969 of 2020 10-04-2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis