IN T 204 Citizens fo Sh. Parmin CORAM: Present: NIDHI GU of order da of this Cou (Regd.) vs. was dispose COCP-553-2019 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.553 of Date of decision : ens for Public Causes (Regd.) Versus arminder Singh Gill, Chief Administ AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NID Mr. G.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rupinder Singh Khosla, Sr Mr. Yogender Verma, Advocat for respondents No.1, 3 and 4. Mr. Somesh Gupta, Advocate S VC) for UOI. I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has b der dated 16.12.2008 (Annexure P-1) p is Court in CWP-17495-2007 titled as d.) vs. The State of Punjab and others= isposed of with the following observati <&.Mr.Sareen learned s the petitioner submits th now taken by the State G survives for consideratio a direction ought to be expedite the process of c to complete the same wit 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 553 of 2019 (O & M) ision :-24.02.2026 &..Petitioner inistrator, GLADA and others &..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA sla, Sr. Advocate with dvocate nd 4. cate Sr. Panel Counsel (through n has been filed alleging violation ) passed by a Division Bench led as <Citizens for Public Causes others=, whereby the writ petition servations :- ed senior counsel appearing for ts that in the light of the decision ate Govenrment, nothing further ration in this petition except that be issued to the government to of construction of the road and e within a specific time frame. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.27 18.00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document respondents compliance construction COCP-553-2019 (O & M) Mr.Amol Rattan S respondents No.1 and 4 process of acquisition o second link between F a yet started as the autho preparing a site plan fo can be truly realistic at t Learned counsel interveners, who happe between missing link No plan submitted that th demolished in case t constructed. It is not challenge to the acquisi to the said land has al Courts and all that rem out the construction work In the circumstanc survives for our conside The writ petition is acco observations that the aut well advised to expedite of the road so that subs incurred on constructio have already been c infructuous. All pendin stand disposed off in li costs.= At the outset, learned Seni ndents No.1, 3 and 4, on instructions, liance of the aforesaid Writ Court o ruction work stands completed except 2 tan Singh, counsel appearing for nd 4. however, submits that the on of the land required for the F and G in the site plan has not uthority is still in the process of an for the same, no time frame at this stage. nsel appearing for some of ppen to be owners of the land k No.1 marked D to E in the site t their houses have yet to be se the said link was to be not, however, disputed that quisition proceedings in relation s already been repelled by the remains to be done is to carry work in that area. stances, therefore, nothing really sideration in these proceedings. accordingly disposed off with the e authorities concerned would be edite the process of construction substantial expenditure already uction of the two stretches that n constructed does not go ending applications shall also in light of the above order. No Senior Counsel appearing for ctions, submits that in substantial ourt order dated 16.12.2008, the xcept for the missing second link VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.27 18.00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document from Point construction the underta present con case, and respondents of the rema by learned disposed of undertaken, shall be at accordance February 24 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-553-2019 (O & M) Point 8F9 to 8G9. It is further und ruction shall be completed by October, Learned counsel for the petitio ndertaking given on behalf of respo nt contempt petition may be disposed o Keeping in view the peculiar fa and the undertaking given by lea ndents No.1, 3 and 4, time is granted t e remaining link positively on or before In view of the above undertak arned counsel for the parties, the p sed of with the aforesaid direction. However, it is made clear that rtaken, is not completed within the stip be at liberty to seek revival of the dance with law. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh 24, 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 3 r undertaken that the remaining tober, 2026. petitioner submits that in view of respondents No.1, 3 and 4, the osed of. liar facts and circumstances of the by learned Senior Counsel for anted to complete the construction before December, 2026. king and the statements made the present contempt petition is r that in the event the needful, as he stipulated period, the petitioner present contempt petition in any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.27 18.00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document