VIJAY SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/23009/2019 · 2026-02-17
Mandeep Pannu
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3466 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3466 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
215 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.-
CRM-M-23009-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision : 17.02.2026
Vijay Singh and Others
....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and Another
....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Present: Mr. Parveen Moudgil, Advocate for
Ms. Sunita Nain, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG Haryana. -.- MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral)
1.
The present petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of FIR No.13, dated 11.01.2019, under Sections 427/447/506/147/149 IPC registered at Police Station Narwana Sadar, District Jind along with all the consequential proceedings.
2.
Learned State counsel has apprised the Court that all the accused have been acquitted by the learned trial Court in the aforementioned FIR, vide
order dated 09.01.2026, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous.
3.
In view of the submission of learned State counsel, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
4.
Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.
February 17, 2026
(MANDEEP PANNU) tripti
JUDGE
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking
Whether reportable
: Yes/No TRIPTI SAINI 2026.02.19 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document