581.2019CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 5 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 581 OF 2019 IN WP/10449/2018 JYOTI NAMDEVRAO MORE VERSUS SHRI SHIVAJI SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. R.K. Kharat h/f Mr.Panpatte V.S. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. N.B. Patil Advocate for Respondent nos.1 and 2 : Mr. Mr. J.R. Patil CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 27.07.2026 P.C. : 1] Though, learned counsel Mr. Kharat holding for Mr. Panpatte seeks time, but on going through the order under contempt, it is evident that there was direction to the Education Officer (Primary) to take decision on the proposal of the petitioner dated 26.02.2018. 2] On going through the order dated 24.10.2019, the proposal of the petitioner appears to be decided by the Education Officer (Primary) by giving the opportunity to the petitioner. 3] As such, the direction is complied with and nothing survives in this petition. In view of the same, the petition stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE sga 2026:BHC-AUG:31070-DB