Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3424 (BOM)

UTTAM KARBHARI GOLWAD v. S D GOLAIT AND OTHERS

CP/258/2019 · 2026-07-02

Shri Sandipkumar C More, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Contempt Petitionbody2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

932.cp.258.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 932 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 258 OF 2019 IN WP/1229/2018 Uttam Karbhari Golwad VERSUS S. D. Golait And Others __________________________________________________________ Adv. Jadhavar Pratap V. for the Petitioner - Absent Ms. U. S. Bhosale, AGP for State __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 2nd JULY, 2026 PER COURT : 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. The direction was issued to respondent - Scrutiny Committee, Nashik, to decide the tribe claim of the petitioner. 3. Learned AGP, on instructions, submits that the tribe claim of the petitioner is still pending before the Scrutiny Committee and that the same shall be decided within a period of eight (08) weeks, as per the instructions received from the concerned Law Officer of the said Committee. Komal Kamble 1/2 2026:BHC-AUG:25977-DB 932.cp.258.2019 4. We record the said statement as an undertaking to this Court and dispose of the present petition with a further direction to respondent - Scrutiny Committee, Nashik, to decide the pending tribe claim of the petitioner within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of this order. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE Komal Kamble 2/2