619.2019CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 10 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 619 OF 2019 IN WP/4672/2016 BHAURAO SHRIPATI PAWAR ALIAS POKALE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Addl. GP for Respondent/State : Mr. P.S. Patil CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 27.07.2026 P.C. : 1] None for the petitioners. 2] Though the directions were to decide the application of the petitioners claiming rental compensation but on going through the affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent no.4, it appears that since the interest amount under Sections 34 and 28 is already paid to the concerned farmers/petitioners, they are not eligible to claim rental compensation as per procedure laid down. Further it appears that the compensation is already given to the petitioners/farmers. 3] In view of the same, when the petitioners are not held entitled for getting rental compensation, nothing survives in this petition and it stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE sga 2026:BHC-AUG:31059-DB