Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3336 (BOM)

MITHILESH GANESH RAJBHAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 4 ORS

WP/2318/2019 · 2026-06-17

Shri M S Karnik, Shri S M Modak

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

5-WP-2318-2019+IA(L)-24373-2024+IPA(L)-24371-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2318 OF 2019 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.24373 OF 2024 WITH IN PERSON APPLICATION (L) NO.24371 OF 2024 Mithilesh Ganesh Rajbhar ...Petitioner/Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ***** None for the Petitioner/Applicant. Mr.Suraj Gupte, AGP, for Respondents–State. Mr.Girish Utangale i/b.Utangale and Company, Advocate for Respondent No.5–SRA. Mr.Akshay Pawar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.6,7 and 8 ***** CORAM : M.S.KARNIK & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE : 17th JUNE 2026 P. C. :- 1. None for the Petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for Respondent Nos.6,7 and 8 submits that in view of the passage of time, the reliefs prayed for in this Petition become infructuous. The Petition is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous. Satish Sangar 1/2 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2026.06.17 17:13:03 +0530 5-WP-2318-2019+IA(L)-24373-2024+IPA(L)-24371-2024.doc 3. Liberty to the Petitioner to apply is kept open in case, they are in a position to satisfy that the cause for which the Petition was filed still survives. 4. Pending Applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (S. M. MODAK, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.) Satish Sangar 2/2