USHA S. PRABHUDESAI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
APL/337/2019 · 2026-04-28
Shri Shivkumar Dige
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3324 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3324 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
3-APL-1659-2019 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1659 OF 2019 Samir S. Sagwekar ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ...Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 330 OF 2019 Dipti D. Naik ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 331 OF 2019 Jagdish R. Patil ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 333 OF 2019 Rajaram R. Dalvi ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 334 OF 2019 Sharada C. Lade …Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 335 OF 2019 Sandhya A. Samant ...Applicant NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Digitally signed by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2026.05.05 14:18:07 +0530
3-APL-1659-2019 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 336 OF 2019 Asha H. Jadhav ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 337 OF 2019 Usha S. Prabhudesai ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 338 OF 2019 Shekar L. Ayerkar ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 339 OF 2019 Rupali R. Kulkarni ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 340 OF 2019 Rupak M. Kulkarni ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 341 OF 2019
3-APL-1659-2019 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble Atul P. Pawar ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 342 OF 2019 Pandurang J. Bhogale ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 343 OF 2019 Somnath B. Gaonkar …Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 344 OF 2019 Prasad A. Avasare ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 345 OF 2019 Jagdish R. Malvankar ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 346 OF 2019 Sandeep H. Raut ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 347 OF 2019
3-APL-1659-2019 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble Milind D. Parab ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 348 OF 2019 Sheela R. Shinde ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.
349 OF 2019 Vidya S. Rane ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 350 OF 2019 Khemji V. Naik ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 351 OF 2019 Bharti S. Pimpale ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 352 OF 2019 Alka S. Pimple ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondents
3-APL-1659-2019 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 353 OF 2019 Dyaneshwar T. Kadave ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 354 OF 2019 Mukul B. Sapte ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 355 OF 2019 Vishwas N. Shinde ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 356 OF 2019 Jyoti D. Parab ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 357 OF 2019 Madhusudan D. Desai ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 358 OF 2019 Nitin N. Apte ...Applicant VERSUS
3-APL-1659-2019 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 359 OF 2019 Devendra P. Parab ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 360 OF 2019 Megha A. Rane ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 361 OF 2019 Varsha P. Pachnekar ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 362 OF 2019 Madhavi M. Naik ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 363 OF 2019 Pallavi P. Chavan ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 364 OF 2019 Sunil C. Wavade ...Applicant
3-APL-1659-2019 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 365 OF 2019 Rajesh V. Bhongle ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.
366 OF 2019 Sudesh V. Kondvilkar ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra …Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1660 OF 2019 Vaibhav S. Warlikar ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1661 OF 2019 Pradeep S. Salian ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1662 OF 2019 Vinita V. Anaredy ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1663 OF 2019
3-APL-1659-2019 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble Sneha A. Nerurkar ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1664 OF 2019 Urmila L. Kanvinde …Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1665 OF 2019 Arvind N. Mandalia ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1666 OF 2019 Nilesh P. Rane ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1667 OF 2019 Hindurao S. Patil ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1668 OF 2019 Jyoti J. Raut ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1669 OF 2019
3-APL-1659-2019 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble Jayshree M. Likhate ...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents ____________________________________________________________ Mr.Mahesh Kukreja a/w Mr.Salman Haidar Khan and Mr.Shivam Singh, for the Applicant. Mr.M.G. Patil, APP for Respondent-State. Mr.Anoop Patil a/w Mr.P.P. Chavhan i/b Ms.Komal Punjabi, for the Respondent-BMC. Mr.Jagannath Gavhane, AE-DP-R-II. Mr.Rahul Ishi, SE-BD-R-5. ____________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 28th APRIL 2026 P.C. : . Heard learned counsel for the Applicant, learned APP and
learned counsel for Respondent No.2-Corporation.
2. The learned counsel for Respondent No.2-Corporation tendered copy of the instructions. It is taken on record.
3. The learned counsel for Respondent No.2-Corporation further submitted that the Respondent No.2 has decided to withdraw impugned notice issued to the Applicants under Section 353A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (‘MMC Act’ for short) and Applications will be filed in that regard before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate and requested to pass appropriate order.
3-APL-1659-2019 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble
4. The learned counsel for the Applicant, on submission of the
learned counsel for Respondent No.2 submits that, the Applications be
disposed of accordingly since it have become infructuous as the Corporation is going to withdraw the notice on which impugned order has been passed.
5. Considering the submissions of both learned counsel, the challenge in these Applications is to the issue process order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 471 of the MMC Act. As Respondent No.2 is going to withdraw the said notices, nothing survives in these Applications and I pass following order.
ORDER (i) The Applications are disposed of as infructuous. (ii) All pending Applications are disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)