BHASKAR EKNATH BADAK v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/13343/2019 · 2026-03-18
Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3309 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3309 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
923 WRIT PETITION NO.13343 OF 2019 Bhaskar Eknath Badak ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ..Respondents ….. Smt. Vaishali P. Dama, AGP for the State. …..
CORAM : N. B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ. Dated :
MARCH 18, 2026 PER COURT :- . Indisputably, the issue raised in the present Petition is covered by the decision of this Court (Coram: Kishore C. Sant & Sushil M. Ghodeswar, JJ.) in Writ Petition No.4582 of 2018 and connected matters decided on 4th February, 2026, wherein it is held that:
“3. The petitioners have filed petition seeking direction to the respondents to absorb the petitioners in service as Gram Rojgar Sevak. This Court find that no such direction can be issued with regard to the post of Gram Rojgar Sevak as they were not appointed on permanent post by following due process of law. In the present case, merely because the petitioners have worked as Gram Rojgar Sevak on the temporary scheme, that does not give any right to get absorbed.
4. Considering the above, this Court finds that petitions are devoid of merit and, therefore, stand dismissed as such.”
2. For the aforesaid reasons, the Petition is dismissed.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.) (N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) GGP 2026:BHC-AUG:12176-DB