RAMRAO DEVIDAS MUNDHE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/5393/2019 · 2026-03-18
Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3294 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3294 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
911 WRIT PETITION NO. 5393 OF 2019 Ramrao Devidas Mundhe .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents ….. AND 912 WRIT PETITION NO. 5394 OF 2019 Janardhan Digambar Kalure ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ..Respondents ….. Shri. P. S. Koshti, Advocate for the Petitioners in both the matters Smt. Vaishali P. Dama, AGP for the State in WP No.5393/2019 Shri. M. A. Aher, AGP for the State in WP No.5394/2019 …..
CORAM : N. B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ. Dated :
MARCH 18, 2026 PER COURT :- . Indisputably, the issue raised in the present Petitions is covered by the decision of this Court (Coram: Kishore C. Sant & Sushil M. Ghodeswar, JJ.) in Writ Petition No.4582 of 2018 and connected matters decided on 4th February, 2026, wherein it is held that:
“3. The petitioners have filed petition seeking direction to the respondents to absorb the petitioners in service as Gram Rojgar Sevak. This Court find that no such direction can be issued with regard to the post of Gram Rojgar Sevak as they were not appointed on permanent post by following due process of law. In the present case, merely because the petitioners have worked as Gram Rojgar Sevak on the temporary 2026:BHC-AUG:12181-DB
2 scheme, that does not give any right to get absorbed.
4. Considering the above, this Court finds that petitions are devoid of merit and, therefore, stand dismissed as such.”
2. For the aforesaid reasons, the Petitions are dismissed.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.) (N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) GGP