Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3247 (BOM)

HARVINDAR SINGH RAGHVIR SINGH NIRH v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/1039/2020 · 2026-02-27

Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 of 2 Sr. Nos-1004-1009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1004 WRIT PETITION NO. 5374 OF 2019 SITARAM BANSI DHUMAL VERSUS MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD THROUGH MANAGER AND ANOTHER ... Mr. Santosh S. Dambe, Advocate for the Petitioner. … AND 1005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1039 OF 2020 HARVINDAR SINGH RAGHVIR SINGH NIRH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. K. G. Narwade h/f. Mr. A. B. Kale, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State. … AND 1006 WRIT PETITION NO. 2398 OF 2020 NITIN BHAUSAHEB MAGRE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Umesh A. Bhadgaonkar and Mr. Y. G. Sanchiti, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State. … AND 1007 WRIT PETITION NO. 4319 OF 2020 THE GENERAL MANAGER THE PARBHANI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO OP BANK LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER VERSUS LAXMAN AMBAJI WAGHMARE AND ANOTHER ... Mr. Ajinkya P. Deshmukh and Mr. Rajaram B. Mule, Advocate for the Petitioner. … Tauseef 2 of 2 Sr. Nos-1004-1009 AND 1008 WRIT PETITION NO. 4331 OF 2020 THE GENERAL MANAGER THE PARBHANI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO OP BANK LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER VERSUS NARAYAN GULABRAO NAYAK AND OTHERS ... Mr. Ajinkya P. Deshmukh and Mr. Rajaram B. Mule, Advocate for the Petitioner. … AND 1009 WRIT PETITION NO. 4479 OF 2020 THE GENERAL MANAGER THE PARBHANI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO OP BANK LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER VERSUS KESHAVRAO RAMRAO AMBHORE ... Mr. Ajinkya P. Deshmukh and Mr. Rajaram B. Mule, Advocate for the Petitioner. … CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 27th FEBRUARY, 2026 P.C.:- 1. The Petitioner is directed to supply the requisite copies within a period of two weeks from today. 2. Upon supply of the copies, issue fresh notice to the Respondents, returnable four weeks thereafter. 3. If the copies are not supplied within the stipulated period, the petition shall stand dismissed for default without further reference to the Court. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef