Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3203 (BOM)

VIKAS S/O. SITARAM WANI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

REVN/210/2019 · 2026-08-21

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 965 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 210 OF 2019 VIKAS S/O. SITARAM WANI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER Mr.S.P.Tiwari h/f Mr.A.K.Tiwari, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.C.B.Bhadane, APP for the Respondent/State. ( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ) DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant. He states that the Applicant was prosecuted by the Respondent/Credit Society u/s 138 of the N.I.Act. The cheques which were dishonoured, were pertaining to the loan account of the Respondent/Credit Society, wherein, the Applicant had obtained the loan amount of Rs.60,000/- on 10.08.2007. The learned Advocate for the Applicant further submits that now the Respondent/Credit Society had issued a letter dated 19.07.2019 that the Applicant has repaid all the loan amount and accordingly issued “No Dues Certificate”. The letter was issued in pursuance to the litigation pending before this Court. Hence, the khs/Aug.2026/210 2026:BHC-AUG:38153 - 2 - original copy of the letter is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for the purpose of identification. 2. In that view of the matter, as the Applicant has repaid the loan amount and the Respondent Bank is not interested in prosecuting the Applicant, this matter does not survive and disposed of accordingly. However, the Applicant is permitted to withdraw the amount paid before this Court. ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) khs/Aug.2026/210