YUVRAJ SONI S/O SHRI KISHAN SONNI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/6805/2019 · 2026-03-24
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3196 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 3196 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6805/2019 Yuvraj Soni S/o Shri Kishan Sonni, R/o Gurjar Mohalla, Vijay Nagar, Police Station Vijay Nagar, District Ajmer (Raj.) ----Accused/Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, through P.P.
2. Rajendra @ Vikky Jain S/o Shri Gopal Kavadiya, aged about 25 Years, R/o Sathana Bazar, Vijay Nagar, Police Station Vijay Nagar, District Ajmer (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Jitendra Choudhary Mr.Gaurav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr.N.S. Dhakar, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 24/03/2026
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned F.I.R. No.203/2019 registered at the Police Station Vijay Nagar District Ajmer for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 354, 452 & 392 IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant by lodging the instant FIR, in fact, the petitioner has not committed any offence whatsoever, hence, under these circumstances, interference of this Court is warranted.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer and submits that after thorough investigation of the matter from all the four corners, the role of the petitioner was found to be prima
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-6805/2019] facie proved, hence, charge-sheet has already been submitted against him. Counsel further submits that under these circumstances, interference of this Court is not warranted and the instant petition is liable to be rejected.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record.
5. Perusal of the impugned F.I.R. and the allegations levelled therein against the petitioner reveals commission of cognizable offence, the correctness of the allegations cannot be adjudicated by this Court at this stage, while exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
6. Considering the fact that after investigation, Police has already submitted charge-sheet against the petitioner before the competent Court of law, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant criminal misc. petition granting liberty to the petitioner to take all available grounds and defence, which have been taken before this Court, at the appropriate stage of the trial.
7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the instant petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush-Shivam /4