Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3193 (BOM)

SONYABAPU LAXMAN BACHKAR AND OTHERS v. SWATI RAJARAM TAKPERE AND ANOTHER

WP/13591/2019 · 2026-08-19

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 946 WRIT PETITION NO. 13591 OF 2019 Sonyabapu Laxman Bachkar And Others VERSUS Swati Rajaram Takpere And Another ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Gandhi Amol S. Advocate for Respondents : Ms. Bhagyashree S. Kamble h/f Mr. Bedre V. S. ... CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. Dated : August 19, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner states that vide order impugned in the present Petition, the learned Civil Court had granted police protection to the Respondent for a particular date, i.e. 15/03/2021. The learned Advocate states that since the said date has already gone, the cause in the Petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. The learned Advocate also draws attention to paragraph No.8 of the reply filed by the Respondent and points out that police protection was in fact granted on 15/03/2021. 3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. ( ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. ) vj gawade/-. Page 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:37310