$~24 to 26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010344772019 CONT.CAS(C) 745/2019, CM APPL. 11774/2021 (Delay of 407 days in filing the reply) & CM APPL. 22735/2026 (For initiating perjury proceedings against the petitioner) PARUL JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate through video- conferencing. versus PANKAJ JAIN .....Respondent Through: Respondent in person through video-conferencing. 25 # CNR No. DLHC010344742019 + CONT.CAS(C) 749/2019 PARUL JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate through video- conferencing. versus PANKAJ JAIN .....Respondent Through: Respondent in person through video-conferencing. 26 # CNR No. DLHC010200252021 CONT.CAS(C) 411/2021 PARUL JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate through video- conferencing. versus This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/08/2026 at 11:12:01 PANKAJ JAIN .....Respondent Through: Respondent through video- conferencing. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 04.08.2026 1. The Petitions, being CONT.CAS(C) 745/2019 and CONT.CAS(C) 411/2021, have been filed under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, 1950 [“Constitution”] read with Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 [“CCA”] seeking initiation of contempt proceedings and action against the Respondent for disobeying and deliberately flouting the Order/Directions/ Undertaking passed vide Judgment dated 16.04.2019, by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in case being MAT.APP.(F.C.) 114/2019, titled “Parul Jain v. Pankaj Jain”. 2. The Petition, being CONT.CAS(C) 749/2019, has been filed under Article 215 of the Constitution read with Sections 11 and 12 of the CCA, seeking initiation of contempt proceedings and action against the Respondent for disobeying and deliberately flouting the Order dated 29.10.2018, passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in case being MAT.APP.(F.C.) 220/2018, titled “Pankaj Jain v. Parul Jain”. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, after advancing arguments for a sufficient period of time and on instructions, seeks the leave of this Court to withdraw the present Petitions. 4. Leave, as sought for, is granted. 5. Accordingly, the present Petitions, along with pending This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/08/2026 at 11:12:01 Application(s), if any, stand dismissed as withdrawn. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. AUGUST 04, 2026/tk/dj This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/08/2026 at 11:12:01