Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3136 (BOM)

ASHOK S/O. CHHAGAN CHAUDHARI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/468/2019 · 2026-07-07

Shri Sandipkumar C More, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 928 to 930.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 468 OF 2019 ASHOK S/O CHHAGAN CHAUDHARI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 929 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 469 OF 2019 PRATAP S/O BALIRAM CHAUDHARI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 930 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 470 OF 2019 SUBHASH S/O NIMBA PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Ms. Priyanka Dayama, Advocate holding for Mr. Umesh Gite, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.J. Salgare, Mrs. D.S. Jape, Mrs. Uma Bhosale, APPs for respondents-State in respective petitions. ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 7 JULY 2026. Per Court : . In all these three petitions, the report of Resource Personnel of this Court dated 03.07.2026 indicates that the petitioners have filed purshis dated 24.02.2020 mentioning that the petitioners have already received their entire dues from the respondent Bank alongwith interest on 20.02.2020. (2) 928 to 930.odt In view of the same, nothing survives in all these three petitions. As such, these petitions stand disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde