Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3121 (BOM)

MANIK DEORAO BARGAJE AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

CP/146/2019 · 2026-07-02

Shri Sandipkumar C More, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Contempt Petitionbody2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

929.cp.146.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 929 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 146 OF 2019 IN WP/14771/2017 Manik Deorao Bargaje And Another VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ Adv. Dhakne Vijay A. for the Petitioners - Absent Mr. S. J. Salgare, AGP for State __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 2nd JULY, 2026 PER COURT : 1. None for the petitioners. 2. Learned AGP, by inviting our attention to the affidavit-in-reply, submits that respondent No.4 has already deposited an amount of Rs.5,48,134/- in the account of Petitioner No. 2 towards compliance with the order under contempt. Petitioner No.2 has also not remained present before this Court for a considerable period. Therefore, it can safely be inferred that the grievance of Petitioner No. 2 stands redressed. Komal Kamble 1/2 2026:BHC-AUG:25976-DB 929.cp.146.2019 3. It is further submitted that, by order dated 25.09.2019, this Court had already disposed of the present petition in respect of petitioner No.1. 4. In view of the above, nothing survives in the present petition. Accordingly, the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE Komal Kamble 2/2