Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3048 (BOM)

RUPESH JITAN SINGH AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 5 ORS

WP/996/2019 · 2026-05-08

Shri M S Karnik, Shri S M Modak

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

8. WP 996 of 2019.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 996 OF 2019 Rupesh Jitan Singh and Anr. ...Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors. ...Respondents ***** None for the Petitioner Ms. Ruchi Vijay Patil - for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4-SRA Smt. Nazia Sheikh – AGP for Respondent No. 1-State Mr. Devesh Shah a/w Ishaan Choudhary i/by IC Legal – For Respondent No. 6 ***** CORAM : M. S. KARNIK AND S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE : 08th MAY 2026 P. C. :- 1. Learned counsel for Respondent says that with passage of time, the reliefs claimed in this petition has become infructuous. None for the Petitioner. If the Petitioner satisfies that the cause survives, liberty to apply restoration. 2. Petition is disposed as infructuous. (S. M. MODAK, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.) Seema 1/1 LATA SUNIL PANJWANI Digitally signed by LATA SUNIL PANJWANI Date: 2026.05.08 17:02:59 +0530