Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 3001 (BOM)

SUDHAKAR RAMRAO PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/4590/2019 · 2026-04-02

Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Dilwale 1 6-WP-4590-19.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 6 WRIT PETITION NO. 4590 OF 2019 Sudhakar Ramrao Patil VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. M. Madke h/f Mr. Bhise Sachin S AGP for Respondents: Mr. R. B. Dhaware ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 02.04.2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. By way of present petition, petitioner assails notices dated 29/12/2018, issued by the Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Kallam, Dist. Osmanabad in accordance with the provisions under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act 1966. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the notices were issued without giving opportunity of hearing the petitioner. 4. Petitioner is permitted to file reply to the notices dated 29/12/2018, which are impugned herein. Municipal Council shall consider the said reply and give opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders. 5. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J ] 2026:BHC-AUG:15854