Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2019 DAILYLAW 2954 (BOM)

BEBINANDA CHANDRAKANT MUSKAWAD LATUR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

PIL/8/2019 · 2026-02-17

Shri Hiten S Venegavkar, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi

Public Interest Litigationbody2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 910PIL8.2019.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 8 OF 2019 Bebinanda Chandrakant Muskawad Latur VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mrs. P. G. Sontakke - Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. R. S. Wani - AGP for the State Mr. R. K. Ashtekar h/f Mr. S. S. Manale - Advocate for Respondent No. 3 ... CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATED : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2026 PER COURT : - 1. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the purpose for which the Petition was filed i.e. for the construction of a Primary Health Center at Gudsoor, Tal. Udgir, District Latur, has been achieved, and therefore, the Petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of the above statement, the Petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. [HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] JUDGE JUDGE SG Punde Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 20/02/2026 10:59:18